An update on emerging drugs for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a look towards 2023 and beyond.

INTRODUCTION: Currently approved drug treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), pirfenidone and nintedanib, have been shown to slow lung function decline and improve clinical outcomes. Since significant advances in the understanding of pathogenetic mechanisms in IPF, novel potential agents are being tested to identify new targeted and better tolerated therapeutic strategies. AREAS COVERED: This review describes the evidence from IPF phase II and III clinical trials that have been completed or are ongoing in recent years. The literature search was performed using Medline and Clinicaltrials.org databases. Particular attention is paid to the new inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4B (BI 1015550), being studied in a more advanced research phase. Some emerging critical issues of the pharmacological research are highlighted considering the recent outstanding failures of several phase III trials. EXPERT OPINION: An exponential number of randomized clinical trials are underway testing promising new molecules to increase treatment choices for patients with IPF and improve patients' quality of life. The next goals should aim at a deeper understanding of the pathogenic pathways of the disease with the challenging goal of being able not only to stabilize but also to reverse the ongoing fibrotic process in patients with IPF.

Challenges in the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) requires the careful exclusion of secondary causes of interstitial lung disease (ILD), and the collaboration among different specialists is considered paramount to establish a diagnosis with high diagnostic confidence. The multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) has assumed an increasing importance over the years in the different phases of the IPF diagnostic work-up. AREAS COVERED: The role of MDD in the diagnosis and management of IPF will be described. Practical insights will be provided into how and when to perform MDD based on the available scientific evidence. Current limitations and future perspectives will be discussed. EXPERT OPINION: In the absence of high diagnostic confidence, agreement between different specialists during MDD is recognized as a surrogate indicator of diagnostic accuracy. Often, despite a lengthy evaluation, the diagnosis remains unclassifiable in a significant percentage of patients. MDD therefore appears to be pivotal in attaining an accurate diagnosis of ILDs. The discussion among different specialists can also include other specialists, such as rheumatologists and thoracic surgeons, in addition to the core group of pulmonologists, radiologists, and pathologists. Such discussions can allow greater diagnostic accuracy and have important effects on management, pharmacologic therapies, and prognosis.

Novel insights in fibrotic pulmonary sarcoidosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In chronic pulmonary sarcoidosis, the transition from the inflammatory to the fibrotic stage of the lungs occurs in about 10-20% of cases, eventually causing end-stage fibrotic disease. To date, pathogenetic mechanisms and clinical management remain challenging; thus, we highlight the recent evidence in pulmonary fibrotic processes, clinical signs for an early detection and the potential role of the current investigated antifibrotic agents and promising targeted therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent findings of relevant key cellular pathways can be considered as a glimmer of light in the complexity of sarcoidosis. In some patients, granulomas persist and serve as a nidus for fibrosis growth, sustained by several fibrosis-stimulating cytokines. Preclinical studies have detected profibrotic, antifibrotic and pleiotropic T cells as promoters of fibrosis. Epigenetics, genetics and transcriptomics research can lead to new target therapies. Antifibrotic drug nintedanib has shown a positive effect on non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis fibrotic lung diseases including fibrotic sarcoidosis; other antifibrotic drugs are under investigation. SUMMARY: Pulmonary fibrosis strongly impacts the outcome of sarcoidosis, and a better understanding of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms can facilitate the development of novel treatments, improving clinical care and life expectancy of these patients. The greatest challenge is to investigate effective antifibrotic therapies once fibrosis develops. The role of these findings in fibrotic sarcoidosis can be translated into other interstitial lung diseases characterized by the coexistence of inflammatory and fibrotic processes.

Prevalence and characteristics of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease in a prospective registry.

BACKGROUND: Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) is characterised by progressive physiological, symptomatic and/or radiographic worsening. The real-world prevalence and characteristics of PF-ILD remain uncertain. METHODS: Patients were enrolled from the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis between 2015 and 2020. PF-ILD was defined as a relative forced vital capacity (FVC) decline ≥10%, death, lung transplantation or any two of: relative FVC decline ≥5% and <10%, worsening respiratory symptoms or worsening fibrosis on computed tomography of the chest, all within 24 months of diagnosis. Time-to-event analysis compared progression between key diagnostic subgroups. Characteristics associated with progression were determined by multivariable regression. RESULTS: Of 2746 patients with fibrotic ILD (mean±sd age 65±12 years; 51% female), 1376 (50%) met PF-ILD criteria in the first 24 months of follow-up. PF-ILD occurred in 427 (59%) patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 125 (58%) with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), 281 (51%) with unclassifiable ILD (U-ILD) and 402 (45%) with connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD). Compared with IPF, time to progression was similar in patients with HP (hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% CI 0.79-1.17), but was delayed in patients with U-ILD (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.96) and CTD-ILD (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.74). Background treatment varied across diagnostic subtypes, with 66% of IPF patients receiving antifibrotic therapy, while immunomodulatory therapy was utilised in 49%, 61% and 37% of patients with CHP, CTD-ILD and U-ILD, respectively. Increasing age, male sex, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and lower baseline pulmonary function were independently associated with progression. CONCLUSIONS: Progression is common in patients with fibrotic ILD, and is similarly prevalent in HP and IPF. Routinely collected variables help identify patients at risk for progression and may guide therapeutic strategies.

Advances with pharmacotherapy for the treatment of interstitial lung disease.

INTRODUCTION: In recent decades, the primary focus of pharmaceutical research in interstitial lung diseases (ILD) has been on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Recently, pharmaceutical development has also focused on other forms of ILDs, including connective tissue diseases associated ILD, fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and sarcoidosis. AREAS COVERED: The authors summarize the advances in pharmacotherapy for the treatment of ILD. Specifically, the authors review the most recent studies and discuss the most recent research findings and future prospects. EXPERT OPINION: Data collected over the past years have confirmed the efficacy of antifibrotic drugs on slowing disease progression in IPF. The usual strategy for CTD-ILD management is represented by the combined use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. There is an urgent need for new target therapies. The concept of progressive fibrosing ILD has emerged in the ILD community in recent years, which has led to grouping several diseases with a common disease behavior to find an effective treatment . At present, selecting the best therapy in ILDs should be reasonably performed on a case-by-case basis through a multidisciplinary team discussion in tertiary ILD centers, taking into consideration patients' symptoms, lung functional trends, and radiological changes.

Association of BMI and Change in Weight With Mortality in Patients With Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease.

BACKGROUND: Mortality risk assessment in interstitial lung disease (ILD) is challenging. Our objective was to determine the prognostic significance of BMI and change in weight in the most common fibrotic ILD subtypes. RESEARCH QUESTION: Could BMI and weight loss over time be reliable prognostic indicators in patients with fibrotic ILD? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This observational retrospective multicenter cohort study enrolled patients with fibrotic ILD from the six-center CAnadian REgistry for Pulmonary Fibrosis (CARE-PF, derivation) and the ILD registry at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF, validation). Patients were subcategorized as underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9), overweight (BMI 25-29.9), or obese (BMI > 30). Annual change in weight was calculated for all years of follow-up as the slope of best fit using the least square method based on every available measurement. Separate multivariable analyses evaluated the associations of BMI and change in weight with mortality, adjusting for common prognostic variables. RESULTS: The derivation and validation cohorts included 1,786 and 1,779 patients, respectively. Compared with patients with normal BMI, mortality was highest in patients who were underweight (hazard ratio [HR], 3.19; 95% CI, 1.88-5.43; P < .001) and was lowest in those who were overweight (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36-0.75; P < .001) or obese (HR, 0.55; 95%CI, 0.37-0.83; P < .001) in the analysis adjusted for the ILD-GAP (gender, age, physiology) Index. Patients who had a weight loss of at least 2 kg within 1 year had increased risk of death in the subsequent year (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.01-1.97; P = .04) after adjustment for the ILD-GAP Index and baseline BMI category, with a plateau in risk for patients with greater weight loss. Consistent results were observed in the validation cohort. INTERPRETATION: Both BMI and weight loss are independently associated with 1-year mortality in fibrotic ILD. BMI and weight loss may be clinically useful prognostic indicators in fibrotic ILD.

COVID-related fibrosis: insights into potential drug targets.

INTRODUCTION: Lung injury in severe COVID-19 pneumonia can rapidly evolve to established pulmonary fibrosis, with prognostic implications in the acute phase of the disease and long-lasting impact on the quality of life of COVID-19 survivors. This is an emerging medical need, and it has been hypothesized that antifibrotic treatments could have a role in ameliorating the fibrotic process in the lungs of these patients. AREAS COVERED: The safety and efficacy of available antifibrotic drugs (nintedanib and pirfenidone) and novel promising agents are being assessed in several ongoing clinical trials that were performed either in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care, or in discharged patients presenting fibrotic sequalae from COVID-19. Literature search was performed using Medline and Clinicaltrials.org databases (2001-2021). EXPERT OPINION: Despite the strong rationale support the use of antifibrotic therapies in COVID-related fibrosis, there are several uncertainties regarding the timing for their introduction and the real risks/benefits ratio of antifibrotic treatment in the acute and the chronic phases of the disease. The findings of ongoing clinical trials and the long-term observation of longitudinal cohorts will eventually clarify the best management approach for these patients.

An updated safety review of the drug treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

INTRODUCTION: The approval of antifibrotic agents nintedanib and pirfenidone revolutionized the management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). These treatments showed acceptable tolerability in randomized-clinical trials; however, they have been associated with a spectrum of potential side effects which require careful assessment of risks and benefits in the individual patient before commencing and during antifibrotic therapy. AREAS COVERED: The accrued evidence on safety of nintedanib and pirfenidone is summarized, from the first randomized clinical trials to the open-label extension studies and post-marketing clinical experiences which helped clarify the long-term tolerability of these drugs. EXPERT OPINION: The data collected over the last years confirmed the comparable tolerability profile of nintedanib and pirfenidone. The physician's assessment of expected side effects may help decide the optimal first-line therapy for the individual patient. Patient's counseling during treatment remains essential to manage emerging adverse events and eventually inform the decision of drug discontinuation.

Are newly launched pharmacotherapies efficacious in treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis? Or is there still more work to be done?

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a challenging and multifactorial disease that has been thought for some time to lack effective treatments. The approval of two drugs, nintedanib and pirfenidone, has heralded a new era in its management. Areas covered: Currently, there is a growing interest on therapeutic strategies. Many studies have been designed and performed, although few of them turned out to be successful. Nowadays, nintedanib and pirfenidone are considered disease modifying drugs, recommended treatments by current evidence-based guidelines. A combined approach with more than one drug could be an effective strategy in IPF. However, data on combination therapy of the two approved drugs are still scarce, and ongoing trials are evaluating pharmacodynamic interactions and safety. The approved disease modifying drugs are also being assessed in combination with new molecules, showing promising results in preclinical models. Expert opinion: A deeper understanding of pathogenesis and key molecular mechanisms driving disease inception and progression will be key to identify novel agents to be tested both pre-clinically and clinically, possibly in combination with approved treatments. Looking at the near future, it is likely that clinical trials will adopt a phenotype-specific and pathway-specific approach, thus leading towards a personalized approach to IPF management.